Blog

# The Quest for 700: Weekly GMAT Challenge (Answer)

Yesterday, Manhattan GMAT posted a 700 level GMAT question on our blog. Today, they have followed up with the answer:

In problems involving “decimal functions,” which involve rounding decimals up or down to a nearby integer, we must be very careful to follow directions precisely. Here, we have two functions that have similar but distinct definitions.

To avoid confusion between the two functions, evaluate just one function’s results first.

The function g(x) is defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to x. So g(1.7) = 1, while g(–1.7) = –2. Notice how this function operates on negative numbers. The results are not symmetrical: g(–1.7) does not equal the negative of g(1.7).

Likewise, we have the function h(x) defined as the least integer greater than or equal to x. So h(2.3) = 3, while h(–2.3) = –2. Again, the results are not symmetrical: h(–2.3) does not equal the negative of h(2.3).

Now we multiply the results together.
g(1.7) × h(2.3) × g(–1.7) × h(–2.3) = 1 × 3 × (–2) × (–2) = 12.

### Upcoming Events

• Dartmouth Tuck (Round 3)
• London Business School (Round 3)
• Texas McCombs (Round 3)
• Vanderbilt Owen (Round 4)
• Berkeley Haas (Round 4)
• Penn State Smeal (Round 4)
• Penn Wharton (Round 3)
• Columbia (Round 3)
• Northwestern Kellogg (Round 3)
• Virginia Darden (Round 3)
• Chicago Booth (Round 3)
• Michigan Ross (Round 3)
• MIT Sloan (Round 3)
• Stanford GSB (Round 3)
• Yale SOM (Round 3)
• Cornell Johnson (Round 3)
• UCLA Anderson (Round 3)
• USC Marshall (Round 3)
• Toronto Rotman (Round 4)
• UNC Kenan-Flagler (Round 4)
• Georgetown McDonough (Round 4)