 ## Blog

### The Quest for 700: Weekly GMAT Challenge (Answer)

Yesterday, Manhattan GMAT posted a 700 level GMAT question on our blog. Today, they have followed up with the answer:

The question can be rephrased “Is b = a + 1 and is c = a + 2?”

One way to approach the statements is to substitute these expressions involving a and solve for a. Since this could involve a lot of algebra at the start, we can just substitute a + 1 for b and test whether c = a + 2, given that both are integers.

Statement 1: SUFFICIENT.

Following the latter method, we have

1/a – 1/(a + 1) = 1/c

(a + 1)/[a(a + 1)] – a/[a(a + 1)] = 1/c

1//[a(a + 1)] = 1/c

a2 + a = c

Now we substitute a + 2 for c and examine the results:

a2 + a = a + 2

a2 = 2

a is the square root of 2. However, since a is supposed to be an integer, we know that our assumptions were false, and a, b, and c cannot be consecutive integers.

We can now answer the question with a definitive “No,” making this statement sufficient.

We could also test numbers. Making a and b consecutive positive integers, we can solve the original equation (1/a – 1/b = 1/c). The first 4 possibilities are as follows:

1/1 – 1/2 = 1/2

1/2 – 1/3 = 1/6

1/3 – 1/4 = 1/12

1/4 – 1/5 = 1/20

Examining the denominators, we can see that c = ab. None of these triples so far are consecutive, and as a and b get larger, c will become more and more distant, leading us to conclude that a, b, and c are not consecutive.

Statement 2: SUFFICIENT

Let’s try substituting (a + 1) for b and (a + 2) for c.

a + a + 2 = (a + 1)2 – 1

2a + 2 = a2 + 2a

2 = a2

Again, we get that a must be the square root of 2. However, we know that a is an integer, so the assumptions must be false. We can answer the question with a definitive “No,” and so the statement is sufficient.

The answer is D: Each statement is sufficient.

#### Upcoming Events

• UNC Kenan-Flagler (Round 3)
• USC Marshall (Round 3)
• Carnegie Mellon Tepper (Round 3)
• London Business School (Round 3)
• Cambridge Judge (Round 4)
• NYU Stern (Round 4)