Blog

MBA Admissions Myths Destroyed: I Need to Tell It All!

In your pursuit of acceptance to business school, you are competing against thousands of other applicants. Because you do not actually know these individuals, you may naturally assume that you need any and every edge available to stand out. As a result, you may feel compelled to provide every single detail of your life, exploiting your resume in particular to do so. We want you to maximize your opportunities, of course, but we also want to be sure you do not jeopardize your application by offering too much information.

Our experience has shown that many resumes—especially those in which every margin is narrowed and every font is made smaller—provide a detrimental surplus of detail. Some become so dense with text that rather than being easily scannable, which is the ideal, they are entirely impenetrable and therefore easy to ignore. We often tell clients that “less is more,” explaining that a brief resume that will be read in full is more beneficial than a dense resume that will not get read at all. At an Association of International Graduate Admissions Consultants Conference, eight leading admissions officers were asked whether they would prefer a one-page or two-page resume, and one person led all the others in declaring, “Everyone together… one page!”

Even with a one-page resume, however, you need to understand what is useful to include and what should be excluded. The answer to this riddle is different for everyone. You may consider jettisoning internships from years gone by, for example, or reducing the number of bullet points offered for past jobs. Eliminating entries for community involvements from long ago could be helpful. The agenda for your resume should be to create maximum impact, and sometimes that is achieved by using fewer words and bullet points. You may need to make tough choices, but the time and effort will be well spent if you ultimately submit a stronger resume and thereby make a more compelling statement about yourself.

We’ve discussed observing limits with your resume. Now, we take a similar approach with your essays—in particular, your goals essay. Some business schools ask applicants to discuss their career progress first in a classic goals essay:

Briefly asses your career progress to date. Elaborate on your future career plans and your motivation for pursuing an MBA.

Whereas other schools do not request any professional context:

What are your short-term and long-term post-MBA goals? How will our school help you achieve these goals?

Applicants tend to seize on these broad, open-ended questions as opportunities to discuss their entire career history in depth, offering far more than mere context for their goals. In response to a question like the first one here, some candidates will mistakenly use 75% or more of the word space provided just discussing their career progression to date. Although this may seem “brief” to you, the truth is that focusing so extensively on your past minimizes your opportunity to discuss other crucial aspects of your candidacy.

If you devote too much of your essay to detailing your past career progress, you will be unable to thoroughly address your reasons for wanting an MBA and your interest in the school. Providing context for your goals by giving an overview of your professional life to date is unquestionably important, but you must be sure to balance the different sections of your essay. Clearly conveying your goals and your reasons for choosing a particular school is crucial so that you connect with your target, rather than miss it entirely.

Should I Apply to Business School in Round 3?

Before we can offer any guidance on whether submitting your business school application in Round 3 is a good idea or not, we need to clarify some terminology. Business schools typically have three rounds of application submission deadlines: Round 1 is usually in September or October, Round 2 in January, and Round 3 in March or April. Some MBA programs do have four rounds, however, in which case the first is in September, the second in November, the third in January, and the fourth in March. Four rounds tends to be more common with European schools, though. So, when we talk about “Round 3,” we are generally referring to a school’s last round. The advice we offer here therefore applies to the final deadline in an application cycle, whether that is labelled Round 3 or Round 4.

Business schools typically consider Round 3 the “shaping round.” By the time admissions officers are reviewing Round 3 applications, they have already accepted the vast majority of the next incoming class of students (in Rounds 1 and 2) and have a pretty good sense of how balanced the class is in terms of diversity (e.g., gender, age, race, citizenship, industry, college, background). Therefore, in Round 3, the schools’ are primarily focused on increasing the diversity of the class, and this is the lens through which they view that round’s applicants. Of course, the programs must first confirm that any candidates they are considering are qualified, but beyond that, their goal is ensuring that the class is as varied as possible. Keep in mind that Round 3 applicants are competing for the few remaining spots not only with other Round 3 applicants but also with waitlisted candidates from Rounds 1 and 2.

Given these factors, we would say that if you believe you are coming from an overrepresented demographic in business school admissions (e.g., consultant, investment banker), you would likely have a better chance of being accepted at your target program if you wait until Round 1 of the next admissions season to apply. However, if you are from a less represented industry or country—or have some other particularly distinctive attribute in your candidacy—you might have a better shot at success in Round 3.

We should note that these concerns about Round 3 are generally only applicable to the top 20 or so U.S. schools. This means that if you are considering applying to an MBA program in Round 3 (or the “last” round), one way of balancing the risks is by applying to schools outside the U.S. top 20.

Do I Need an MBA Application Consultant with an Admissions Background?

When our clients are trying to decide which of our Senior Consultants to work with on their MBA applications, they often ask, “Should I pick someone who has worked in a business school admissions office before?” We like to answer this question using an analogy.

A food critic is someone who is skilled at evaluating meals that others have prepared. When reviewing a dish, a food critic assesses only the end product, considering various factors, such as composition, presentation, flavor, texture, and freshness. They then determine whether or not they enjoyed the dish and whether it could be enhanced.

A chef, on the other hand, is someone who is skilled at preparing meals. Chefs focus on the process of producing the desired end product, rather than judging that end product when it is complete. Beginning with raw ingredients, a chef conceives of an idea and then manages the additions, adjustments, and balancing of the elements involved to ultimately create the best possible version of the final dish—the end product the food critic will assess.

Within the context of MBA admissions consulting, former admissions officers and experienced writers can be seen as food critics and chefs, respectively. The former is trained in appraising the value of a candidate’s end product—the application—and making a decision about its effectiveness. However, these individuals do not participate in the process of creating the applications they review. In fact, a former director of admissions at a top MBA program once admitted to us, “I would make a terrible admissions consultant because, while I know what I like to see, I don’t know how to help applicants get there.”

Even though having firsthand experience within a business school’s admissions office can confer some applicable insight, this alone is not enough to equip someone to guide an applicant through the process of crafting a compelling application. This is why at mbaMission, we ensure that every MBA admissions expert we hire is an accomplished writer (who also has an MBA), someone who knows the ins and outs of creating an engaging and successful narrative. We are “chefs” who oversee the fusion of the various components of an applicant’s candidacy—exploring different stories, mixing and matching them, changing the proportions—so that the end product is something the candidate is proud of.

Start getting answers to all your application-related questions by taking advantage of a free 30-minute consultation with an expert from mbaMission’s Senior Consultant team. No matter where you are in the admissions process, we can provide you with actionable feedback that will help you improve your MBA application. 

Long-Term MBA Application Planning with onTrack

If you are applying to business school in the fall, you might be wondering when you should begin preparing your MBA candidacy. The answer is now! Although applications will not open for a few more months, you can—and should—still do a lot in this pre-application stage to begin building your strongest possible profile. Our in-depth, on-demand MBA admissions course, onTrack by mbaMission, is a fantastic resource to support you on your MBA application long-term planning journey. Here is how onTrack can help you master some of the important things you need to be working on in the coming months.

Standardized Testing

If you have not yet taken the GMAT, GRE, or Executive Assessment, you should start creating your study plan now. Successful applicants typically spend months preparing for these exams, and taking a test more than once is very common. onTrack’s Testing 101 module explains everything you need to know about your exam options, helps you determine which test is the best one for you, and guides you in creating a personalized study plan and timeline. If you use this valuable time before applications open to prepare for and take your exam of choice, you will thank yourself later!

Profile Evaluation

If you are wondering how your test score, GPA, and professional experiences compare to those of other business school applicants, the MBA Stats module of onTrack evaluates each component of your applicant profile to help you determine your competitiveness. More than six months remain before the Round 1 deadlines, so you still have time to address any weaknesses in your candidacy, but only if you identify those weaknesses now! onTrack’s Mitigating Weaknesses module presents ways you can offset a suboptimal test score, a low GPA, or other potential red flag in your profile.

Professional and Community Impact

MBA admissions committees evaluate applications holistically. This means that in addition to evaluating your quantifiable stats (e.g., undergraduate GPA, GMAT/GRE score), they will look for evidence of your work ethic and leadership skills. onTrack’s Professional Background module breaks down the steps you can take at work over the next six (or more) months to optimize the professional impact element of your candidacy. If you give yourself enough lead time, you can strengthen this part of your profile in a truly substantial way. Similarly, your community involvement can be a fantastic way to showcase not just your interests and passions outside of work but also your leadership abilities. But again, to impress the admissions committees, you need to start enhancing your efforts in this area as soon as possible so you can show a track record of involvement and leadership by the time you submit your applications. Our Community and Personal Leadership module helps you determine which kinds of community activities to pursue and—just as importantly—how to demonstrate real engagement in those activities. 

School Research

In your business school applications, you need to convince each school’s admissions committee that you are a good fit for their particular MBA program. And to be able to effectively communicate this fit in your essays, short answers, and interviews, you must truly understand the ins and outs of your target programs, after first making sure that the schools on your list are well suited to help you achieve your post-MBA career goals. In addition to a dedicated School Selection module (with over a dozen lessons), onTrack offers in-depth, standalone modules on more than 15 of the top MBA programs. These modules break down each school’s pros and cons, curriculum, pedagogy, career paths, and other key features. Using onTrack to research schools will save you an incredible amount of time and ensure that you are always able to craft a standout response when one of your chosen programs asks, “Why our school?”

The winter and spring months are an incredibly important time with respect to building your MBA applicant profile. This is your opportunity to make some valuable progress, but you need to start now! Fortunately, onTrack can guide you smoothly through every step of the pre-application stage, and when the time comes to craft your applications, you will have access to extensive content on essay writing, resumes, recommendations, interviews, and every other element of the application process. onTrack’s more than 80 modules include several hundred video lessons, along with templates, sample essays and resumes, workbooks, checklists, and even an interactive interview tool. To get started, complete a brief, two-minute questionnaire, and a personal onTrack learning path will be customized just for you, based on your background, goals, and target programs. Use the code MBAMBLOG to save 30% on any length onTrack subscription. We wish you the best of luck with your MBA application long-term planning and look forward to seeing you in onTrack!

How to Approach Quantitative Comparison Questions in the GRE

If you are taking the GRE instead of the GMAT, you will have to deal with the GRE’s “weird” question type: Quantitative Comparison (QC). What are these questions, and how do we handle them?

What is Quantitative Comparison?

The GRE and the GMAT really are not math tests, all evidence to the contrary. These tests are actually trying to test us on our “executive reasoning” skills—that is, how well we make decisions and prioritize when faced with too many things to do in too little time.

So, QC questions are really about quickly analyzing some information and figuring out a relationship between two quantities. If we label the two quantities A and B, we have four possibilities:

(A) Quantity A is always bigger than Quantity B.

(B) Quantity B is always bigger than Quantity A.

(C) The two quantities are always equal.

(D) I cannot tell, or there is not an “always” relationship; maybe sometimes A is bigger and sometimes B is bigger, or sometimes A is bigger and sometimes they are equal.

We do, of course, have to do some math—and sometimes that math is quite annoying. We usually do not, however, have to do as much as we usually do on regular “problem solving” questions (the normal Quant questions).

How does Quantitative Comparison work?

First, the question is always the same: figure out the “always” relationship, if there is one (in which case the answer is A, B, or C), or figure out that there is not an “always” relationship, in which case the answer is D.

Some QC questions will provide us with “givens”—information that must be true and that we will need to use when answering the question. For example, a problem might read as follows:

x > 0

So, now I know that x is positive. Is it an integer? Maybe. But it could also be a fraction or decimal, as long as that value is positive.

Next, the problem will give us two columns with their own pieces of information. For example:

Quantity A                                          Quantity B

x = 3                                                      x2-9 = 0

We do not have to do anything with Quantity A; it already tells us what x is. What about Quantity B? Solve:

(x+3)(x-3) = 0

x = -3, x = 3

It seems like the answer should be D, right? Sometimes Quantity A is bigger and sometimes they are the same. Do not forget about our “given,” though! We are only supposed to use positive values for x, so we can ignore x = -3 for Quantity B. Both quantities are always equal, so the answer is C.

Okay, these are weird. How do I get better?

These are going to take some practice, yes. In addition, this was only a very short introduction; a ton of great strategies are out there that you can learn. Look for books, articles, classes, and other resources to help. (Here is one to get you started.)

You also, of course, have to learn a bunch of math. What we have presented here, though, should help you get started on this kind-of-bizarre question type in the first place!


onTrack by mbaMission

A first-of-its-kind, on-demand MBA application experience that delivers a personalized curriculum for you and leverages interactive tools to guide you through the entire MBA application process.

Get Started!

2026–2027 MBA Essay Tips

Click here for the 2025–2026 MBA Essay Tips


MBA Program Updates

Explore onTrack — mbaMission’s newest offering allowing you to learn at your own pace through video. Learn more