Dartmouth College Tuck Essay Analysis, 2015–2016
*Please note: You are viewing an essay analysis from the 2015-2016 admissions cycle. Click here to view our collection of essay analyses for the current admissions season.
The Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College’s essay questions are remarkably straightforward this application season—no curve balls here. You must submit a professional essay explaining your need for an MBA, or more specifically, a Tuck MBA. Then, you must write a leadership experience essay that highlights an instance when you shone. Thereafter, you can craft an optional essay to mitigate any weaknesses in your candidacy, should any exist. With a workable limit of 500 words for each essay, Tuck seems to have created a rather applicant-friendly set of questions. Our analysis of the individual prompts follows…
Tuck Essay 1: What are your short- and long-term goals? Why do you need an MBA to achieve those goals? Why are you interested in Tuck specifically?
Because personal statements are similar from one application to the next, we have produced the mbaMission Personal Statement Guide, which helps applicants write this style of essay for any school. We offer this guide to candidates free of charge. Please feel free to download your copy today.
For a thorough exploration of Dartmouth Tuck’s academic program, merits, defining characteristics, crucial statistics, social life, academic environment, and more, please check out the mbaMission Insider’s Guide to the Tuck School of Business.
Tuck Essay 2: Tell us about your most meaningful leadership experience and what role you played. How will that experience contribute to the learning environment at Tuck?
“Meaningful” is the key word in this essay question. Tuck is not necessarily asking you to share your greatest triumph, but rather your most meaningful experience. For some applicants, the two may be one and the same, but this will not necessarily be the case for all candidates. Therefore, you should think carefully about your boldest achievements as a leader and for each one, consider not just the experience itself, but also the values you represented therein. Tuck is not asking simply for a narrative that shows you have experienced some sort of achievement; the admissions committee needs to know that the incident you have chosen to showcase held some personal value for you.
We suggest that you forego any kind of general introduction and launch into your story right away, immediately placing your reader in the middle of the action. From there, let the narrative unfold naturally, making sure that your actions are very clearly explained and that your anecdote involves an obvious conflict that you either resolved on your own or played a definitive role in resolving. You must then explicitly address why this experience was meaningful to you in a way that is neither trite nor clichéd—and that does not come across like a throwaway statement. In short, writing, “This leadership experience was meaningful to me because I challenged myself and was ultimately successful!” would not work. You must demonstrate self-awareness, and the “meaningful” aspect of the experience must be the clear and logical conclusion of your narrative, yet it must also be a thoughtful exploration of that logical conclusion.
A thoughtful example might be something like this: “Speaking out against our existing bonus plan was clearly risky, because any change in compensation structure risks upsetting the apple cart. I was surprised to find that it galvanized my team, but I also knew that our new structure had to be transparent and fair to work. By giving my team ownership of the design of the new bonus criteria and acting as an approval mechanism, I was able to not only get the best results—our sales clearly took off—but also push myself into a place where I was far more hands-off than ever before. I know that my management style is now different, because I have a new tool to deploy when appropriate.” In this fictitious reflection, the writer explores his motivation and learnings, rather than simply reiterating his essay’s thesis.


