Longer and more complex sentences often require parallel construction. Simply put, parallel construction ensures that any given longer sentence has a standard rhythm or construction. With parallel construction, each pronoun corresponds with another pronoun, each verb corresponds with another verb, each adjective matches with a corresponding adjective and so on. Parallel construction can certainly be found in shorter sentences as well, and to great effect.<\/p>\n
Consider the example of Hamlet\u2019s words \u201cTo be or not to be,\u201d which are some of the most famous in the English language. Shakespeare wrote this short sentence in perfect parallel form; \u201cto be\u201d is matched perfectly with its corresponding negative \u201cnot to be\u201d and is separated only by the necessary word \u201cor.\u201d Another short example of parallel construction from history is \u201cI came, I saw, I conquered.\u201d With these words, Julius Caesar was speaking in perfect parallel construction—the grammatical form is a pronoun (the word \u201cI\u201d) followed by a verb in the past tense (\u201ccame,\u201d \u201csaw,\u201d \u201cconquered\u201d).<\/p>\n
If we were to change that second famous phrase just a touch, the amazing quality that it has would be lost, and the phrase would become unremarkable. For example, if Caesar had said, \u201cI came, I saw, and I became the conqueror,\u201d no one would be quoting him today (because the rhythm would be destroyed—it would now be verb, verb, phrase). Keep this rule in mind for everything that you write, especially for longer sentences.<\/p>\n
Some final examples:<\/p>\n
Bad: There are three key reasons for this success: understanding our client, trying harder than our competition and teamwork.<\/em>
\nGood: There are three key reasons for this success: understanding our client, trying harder than our competition and working as a team. (In this example, gerunds [the words ending in \u201cing\u201d] parallel each other, unlike in the previous, “bad” example.)<\/em><\/p>\n