Have you heard the following admissions myth?<\/p>\n
When a school that has placed you on its waitlist says that it wants no more information from you, this is some kind of \u201ctest,\u201d and you should supply additional materials anyway. As we have discussed in the past, this is patently not true. Similarly, when programs tell their waitlisted candidates they are open to\u00a0important<\/em>\u00a0additional communication, such applicants should\u00a0not\u00a0<\/em>interpret this to mean\u00a0constant<\/em>\u00a0communication. The difference is significant.<\/p>\n As is the case with any waitlist situation, before you do\u00a0anything<\/em>,\u00a0carefully read the waitlist letter you received from the Admissions Office. Frequently, this will include a FAQ sheet or a hyperlink to one. If the school permits candidates to submit additional information but offers no guidance with respect to quantity, this does not mean that you should start flooding the committee with novel information and materials. If you have another potential recommender who can send a letter that highlights a new aspect of your profile, you can consider having him\/her send one in, but you should not start a lobbying campaign with countless alumni and colleagues writing on your behalf.<\/p>\n Similarly, you could send the school an update email monthly, every six weeks, or even every two months\u2014the key is not frequency or volume but materiality. If you have something important to tell the admissions committee that can help shape its perspective on your candidacy (e.g., a new project, a promotion, a new grade, an improved GMAT score, a campus visit), then you should share it. If you do not have such meaningful information to share, then a contrived letter with no real content will not help you. Just because you know others are sending letters, do not feel compelled to send empty correspondences for fear that your fellow candidates might be showing more interest. They just might be identifying\u00a0themselves negatively via their waitlist approach.<\/p>\n Take a step back and imagine that you are on the admissions committee; you have one candidate who keeps you up to date with a few thoughtful correspondences and another who bombards you with empty updates, emails, and recommendations that do not offer anything substantive. Which candidate would you choose if a place opened up in your class? When you are on the waitlist, your goal is to remain in the good graces of the admissions committee. Remember, the committee members already deem you a strong enough candidate to take a place in their class, so be patient and prudent, as challenging as that may be.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n<\/em><\/p>\n