The Quest for 700: Weekly GMAT Challenge (Answer)

Yesterday, Manhattan GMAT posted a GMAT question on our blog. Today, they have followed up with the answer:

In words, we are asked whether the absolute value of w is less than the absolute value of v. We could rephrase this geometrically: is w closer to 0 on the number line than v is? However, we should also retain the original phrasing, which uses concise algebra. (By the way, the condition that v does not equal 0 is only there to prevent division by 0 in the statements.)

Statement (1): INSUFFICIENT. We should not cross-multiply this statement, since we don’t know whether v is positive or negative. That is, we cannot claim that w < v results from w/v < 1, since we can’t multiply both sides of an inequality by a variable and preserve the inequality sign as is, unless we know that the variable is positive.

Let’s instead plug a couple of quick pairs of numbers, trying for a “Yes” case and a “No” case. (The “Yes” case would be one in which |w| is in fact less than |v|, and the “No” case would be one in which |w| is not less than |v|.) Remember to try negative numbers!

Yes case: w = 2, v = 3. 2/3 is indeed less than 1, satisfying the statement.

As for the question, we get |2| < |3|, giving us a “Yes” answer to the question.

No case: w = -5, v = 3. -5/3 is indeed less than 1, satisfying the statement.

But |-5| is NOT less than |3|, so we would answer the question “No.”

Since we have both a Yes case and a No case, this statement is insufficient.

Statement (2): SUFFICIENT. Here, we CAN cross-multiply, since v2 is definitely positive. Thus, we can rephrase the statement as follows:

w2/v2 < 1

w2 < v2

Now, since both sides are positive (or at least not negative), we can take the positive square root of both sides. The positive square root of a square is in fact the absolute value, so we get

|w| < |v|

If you like, test numbers that satisfy w2 < v2. In every case, you will find that |w| < |v|.

The correct answer is (B).

Upcoming Events

Upcoming Deadlines

  • NYU Stern (Round 3)
  • MIT Sloan (Round 2)
  • INSEAD (Round 4)
  • UNC Kenan-Flagler (Round 3)
  • USC Marshall (Round 3)
  • Carnegie Mellon Tepper (Round 3)
  • London Business School (Round 3)
  • Cambridge Judge (Round 4)
  • NYU Stern (Round 4)

Click here to see the complete deadlines

2020–2021 MBA Essay Analysis

Click here for the 2019–2020 MBA Essay Analysis

MBA Program Updates