## Blog

### The Quest for 700: Weekly GMAT Challenge (Answer)

Yesterday, Manhattan GMAT posted a GMAT question on our blog. Today, they have followed up with the answer:

We cannot simplify the given expression very much, because the denominator (which is a sum, a + 3b) is not a factor of the numerator. If we really wanted to, we could split the numerator and write the expression as a sum:

4a/(a + 3b) + 6b/(a + 3b) = ?

Or we could leave the question as is. Either way, be sure not to cancel any of the coefficients, because the denominator is a sum – we can’t simply cancel the 6 in the numerator with the 3 in the denominator, for instance.

Statement 1: INSUFFICIENT. This gives us a relationship between a and b. However, if we use it to solve for one of the variables and then we substitute that expression into the question, we’ll quickly see that we will not get a single number:

From the statement: a = 6 + 3b

Substitute into the original question:

[4(6 + 3b) + 3b]/(6 + 3b + 3b) = ?

We can stop here if we see that the denominator is 6 + 6b, which will not cancel with the numerator of the combined fraction (which equals 24 + 18b).

Statement 2: SUFFICIENT. We can get a constant ratio between a and b, which will actually cancel in the question.

From the statement:

2a/(a + 3b) = 4

2a = 4a + 12b

-2a = 12b

a = -6b

Substitute into the question:

[4(-6b) + 6b]/(-6b + 3b)

= (-24b + 6b)/(-3b)

= (-18b)/(-3b)

= 6

Note that it is okay to cancel out the b’s, since ab ? 0 and thus neither variable equals 0.

As long as we have a constant ratio between a and b, we will get a number out of an expression such as (4a + 6b)/(a + 3b).

The correct answer is (B): Statement 2 is sufficient, but Statement 1 is not sufficient.

#### Upcoming Events

• Berkeley Haas (Round 2)
• NYU Stern (Round 3)
• MIT Sloan (Round 2)
• UNC Kenan-Flagler (Round 3)
• USC Marshall (Round 3)
• Carnegie Mellon Tepper (Round 3)
• London Business School (Round 3)
• Cambridge Judge (Round 4)
• NYU Stern (Round 4)